Looking beyond the boundaries

Updated: 2012-11-02 10:24

By Kevin Jianjun Tu (China Daily)

  Comments() Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按钮 0

Chinese nuclear companies should broaden horizon by forming more joint ventures in overseas markets

On Oct 24, the State Council of China cleared the Nuclear Power Safety Plan (2011-20) as well as the Mid- and Long-term Development Plan for Nuclear Power (2011-20), signaling the long-awaited restart of the world's most ambitious nuclear program after a year-and-a-half hiatus.

In 2011, nuclear energy accounted for less than 2 percent of China's total power generation, the lowest among all nations using nuclear power. Nevertheless, with 26 reactors under construction, China represents about 40 percent of the global new build.

However, the Chinese nuclear industry is not enthused with the updated nuclear target of 40 gW by 2015 as no new inland reactors are permitted in China, while only a few reactors in coastal provinces will get the green light in the next three years.

The plan also envisages that new nuclear reactors in China must adhere to "the highest safety standards in the world". Since it was earlier reported that China's domestically designed second-generation CNP300 and second-generation plus CPR1000 reactors do not even match up to the national safety standards issued in 2004, the new rules insist that new plants should be built with "third-generation" technology, or in other words state-of-the-art nuclear reactors, on the lines of the AP1000 pioneered by Westinghouse and the EPR developed by Areva. Beijing still has a long way to go before any imported third-generation design can be fully indigenized as all the third-generation reactors, the four AP1000s and two EPRs, are still under construction.

Despite these challenges, China has already stepped up export efforts. The most noticeable example is in Pakistan, where China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) has already set up two CNP300 reactors at the Chashma nuclear power complex in Punjab, and started work on the third and fourth reactors at the same project last year. But Chinese nuclear companies' overseas ambitions apparently do not end with Pakistan. The industry is also eyeing project opportunities in many other parts of the world, like Turkey, South Africa, Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom.

While both CNP300 and CPR1000 have already been phased out in China, Beijing lacks sufficient domestic capacity and faces numerous patent-related constraints before it can develop its own export-ready third-generation reactors. The biggest challenge for Chinese nuclear companies is to ensure that their potential nuclear export deals are also backed by stringent safety safeguards.

Chinese nuclear companies' recent attempts to enter the UK nuclear market also show the challenges that these companies face during overseas expansion. Under pressure from Germany's decision to phase out nuclear power by 2022, German utilities RWE and E.ON announced in March the sale of Horizon, a joint venture through which they had planned to build reactors in UK, with a combined capacity of at least 6 gW.

Attracted by the deep pockets of China's state-owned nuclear enterprises, Westinghouse teamed up with China's State Nuclear Power Technology Corporation, while Areva linked up with China Guangdong Nuclear Power Company (CGNPC) to put forward separate offers in the UK.

Due to the significant financial risks involved in building new reactors, especially after the Fukushima nuclear disaster and the potential political opposition to Chinese participation, both these consortiums eventually walked away from the deal. Even so, this case has well illustrated both the strengths and weaknesses of Chinese nuclear enterprises. In order to overcome the technological weakness, Chinese nuclear companies must continuously explore overseas project opportunities by teaming up with leading international players.

Apart from nuclear technology export, China has also become an important player in the international uranium trade and exploration. Since a single 1 gW pressurized water reactor, the most dominant reactor type in China, needs to consume 169.45 to 190.11 metric tons of uranium, 40 gW of nuclear capacity by 2015 roughly translates into about 7,500-8,000 tons of annual natural uranium consumption. With annual uranium production estimated at around 1,000 tons, China would need to procure the balance uranium from the international markets.

Currently, there are two state-owned enterprises that actively participate in international uranium trade, namely China Nuclear International Uranium Corporation (CNIUC), a CNNC subsidiary, and CGNPC. They are expected to rapidly increase uranium imports from around 3,600 tons in 2010 to whatever is the gap between China's rising uranium demand and stagnant domestic production in the years to come.

To be more successful to secure overseas uranium deals, CGNPC has established strategic cooperative agreements in Australia, Canada, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Namibia, South Africa, Central African Republic and Senegal. In comparison, CNIUC's overseas endeavors have been less impressive despite attempts in Mongolia, Jordan, Kazakhstan and Niger.

Though Beijing is executing the world's most ambitious nuclear program, the Chinese nuclear industry still lacks the ability to export third-generation reactors. Given the importance of nuclear safety in any part of the world, Chinese companies should explore more overseas project opportunities by teaming up with international leading players. Otherwise, exporting reactor designs that have already been phased out domestically may not serve the long-term interests of a global nuclear community.

To fuel China's increasingly sizable nuclear generation fleet, Beijing should also encourage its nuclear industries to spread wings abroad to ensure stable supplies of uranium.

The writer is a senior associate at the Washington-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he directs Carnegie's work on China's energy and climate policies. The views expressed here are not necessarily those of China Daily.

(China Daily 11/02/2012 page7)