Leaders to leave legal proceedings alone
Updated: 2015-04-02 07:39
(China Daily)
|
|||||||||||
China's Chief Justice Zhou Qiang delivers the work report of the Supreme People's Court (SPC) to the national legislature at the ongoing annual session, which is more steely resolve for judicial reform, on March 12. [Photo/IC] |
When judicial independence is emphasized in China as a prerequisite for the carriage of justice in judicial practice, stopping government leaders at all levels from having their finger in the pie of legal proceedings has never been so important.
That explains why the general office of the Central Committee of the ruling Communist Party of China and that of the State Council, the cabinet, jointly released a set of regulations on Monday requiring leaders at all levels to keep their hands off legal proceedings.
The rules require that any leader's interference in a case in whatever form be kept on record for investigation. The regulations also stipulate that any judicial worker who fails to do this will also be investigated and penalized.
Interference from government leaders at various levels has long been known to be a key reason for miscarriages of justice. Some local governments give an opinion on how a particular case should be ruled by sending a document to the local court under their auspices. This has led to the perception that a local leader has the mandate to guide a judge on how to deal with a case.
It is common for local government leaders to ask local court for mercy when their relatives or friends stand trial. And some local leaders will give an order to the local police to crack a case in a given period of time, which has resulted in the torturing of suspects to obtain confessions.
For judges and prosecutors who will be held accountable for life for the cases they investigate and rule on, it is essential to keep records of any interference in a case by officials.
For leaders who try to pull the strings in cases, not only will it be included in their performance evaluations, but they also face the risk of being put behind bars for illegally meddling in the work of the judiciary.
So the importance of keeping records of government leaders' involvement in judicial practice is of the utmost importance to the rule of law.
What is particularly noteworthy is the stipulation that the judicial department will regularly publish such records.
This practice, if it can be applied to the letter, may prove to be the most effective way to make government leaders at all levels keep their hands off legal proceedings as transparency will leave no place for any wrongdoing to hide.
Related Stories
China configs "firewall" against official meddling in judicial cases 2015-03-30 17:39
Regulation targets judicial meddling 2015-03-31 08:13
China to blacklist judicial officials for illegal interference 2015-03-28 06:40
Strong case for judicial reform at China's two sessions 2015-03-15 14:26
Today's Top News
Lufthansa insurers set aside $300 mln over crash
Sarkozy makes political comeback
30 nations approved as AIIB founding members
China's PMI eases past 50 in March
Crash pilot had been treated for suicidal tendencies
Britain officially launches general election campaign
China's GDP growth likely to rise to 7.2% in Q2
Yili Group milks world of industry experience
Hot Topics
Lunar probe , China growth forecasts, Emission rules get tougher, China seen through 'colored lens', International board,
Editor's Picks
What do we know about AIIB |
Full coverage of Boao Forum for Asia |
Annual legislative and political advisory sessions |
Festival Special: Apps that make holiday shopping easier |
Listed firms caught in anti-corruption net |
Conca set to return to China |