Chinese Embassy refutes Wall Street Journal's editorial on South China Sea
Updated: 2016-06-10 10:56
By Bian Ji in New York(chinadaily.com.cn)
|
|||||||||
Here is the full text of a letter written on June 10, 2016, by Zhu Haiquan, press counselor and spokesman of the Chinese Embassy in the US, in response to an editorial titled "South China Sea Challenge" published by Wall Street Journal on June 3, 2016.
Regarding your editorial "South China Sea Challenge" (June 3), the origin of the South China Sea dispute is not China's territorial ambition but instead the illegal seizure and occupation of Chinese territory by other countries.
The islands and shoals in the South China Sea have long been Chinese territory. After World War II, China restored its sovereignty over them from Japanese occupation in accordance with the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation, an act upholding postwar rules. But since the 1970s, 42 out of 51 land features in the Nansha Islands have been illegally occupied by other countries.
The 1898 Treaty of Paris, the 1900 Treaty of Washington and the 1930 Convention Between the U.S. and Great Britain defined the western limit of the Philippine's territory as 118 east longitude, reaffirmed by the Philippine Constitution in 1935. China's islands and reefs in the South China Sea, including Huangyan Dao (Scarborough Shoal), are all west of that line.
These historic rights are not superseded by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos). In fact, Unclos respects the historic rights that predate it and are continuously claimed. By not accepting or participating in the arbitration unilaterally initiated by the Philippines, China is simply exercising its legitimate sovereign rights under Unclos.
China has already signed border treaties through peaceful negotiations with 12 out of 14 of its land neighbors. The same practice should be adopted in the South China Sea.
US military operations in the South China Sea only fuel tensions. The moves suggested by this editorial are even more reckless and alarming. No country's interests are served by turning the South China Sea into a geopolitical competing ground.
The US often emphasizes the importance of reducing tension and maintaining the space necessary for diplomatic solution. We hope the U.S. will match its words with deeds.
Related Stories
China, ASEAN nations vow to effectively implement DOC on South China Sea 2016-06-10 02:25
Government of the Republic of Kenya statement on South China Sea 2016-06-09 14:34
The South China Sea dispute: Beijing's view 2016-06-08 20:43
How to bridge the divide over the South China Sea 2016-06-08 20:31
The minutes of the meeting between Vice Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin and US media delegation on the South China Sea issue 2016-06-08 10:38
Today's Top News
China lists first sovereign offshore RMB bond on LSE
British PM denounces Brexit's 'complete untruths'
47% of European businesses would expand in China
Xi urges Washington to boost trust
Council of Europe unveils security convention
Former PM warns of chaos in case of Brexit
Basic income plan rejected by Swiss voters
Eyeing the goal in European football
Hot Topics
Lunar probe , China growth forecasts, Emission rules get tougher, China seen through 'colored lens', International board,
Editor's Picks
Eyeing the goal in European football |
Suddenly, it's a small world |
Crafty business all about the hops |
Dumplings and dragon boats |
Reunited at long last |
New generation of golfers emerges |