Arbitration tribunal's jurisdiction challenged
Updated: 2016-06-18 01:51
By LUIS LIU in Hong Kong and Zhang Yunbi in Beijing (China Daily)
|
|||||||||
Daniel R. Fung, chairman of the Hong Kong-based Asia Pacific Institute of International Law (APIIL) receives interview by Xinhua June 16, 2016. [Photo/Xinhua] |
An international group of legal experts and lawyers have signed a legal opinion document questioning an arbitration tribunal's jurisdiction in a case filed against China by the Philippines.
They have also voiced concern over the suitability of the tribunal to handle such an issue without considering the historical and political context, according to Hong Kong barrister Daniel Fung Wah-kin.
"We hope to protect the integrity and reputation of the tribunal and the whole international law system," Fung said.
In 2013, the Philippines unilaterally filed compulsory arbitration under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea challenging China's sovereignty in the area.
Beijing has refused to be part of the arbitration and says the tribunal has no jurisdiction, while Manila has showed no indication of returning to bilateral negotiations.
Others signing the document include Tony Carty, a British scholar and professor of international law at Tsinghua University, and Natalie Klein, professor and dean of Macquarie Law School in Sydney.
Fung said they are awaiting a reply from the tribunal and have asked for an opportunity to present the case orally.
Although the full text of the document has not been released to the media, its main point is that the tribunal has no jurisdiction over sovereignty disputes and maritime delimitation, as the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea does not issue such judgments.
Huang Yao, dean of the School of Law at Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, said the tribunal has imposed its jurisdiction but has no legitimacy.
Fung said that as Chinese people have had links to the islands in the South China Sea for more than 2,000 years, the tribunal should carry out adequate research into the country's rights and interests before making any judgment.
"These questions should be settled by diplomatic negotiations in treaty form," Fung said.
Kuen-chen Fu, dean of the South China Sea Institute at Xiamen University, said the tribunal should take the document for reference, but it has no obligation to accept it.
Contact the writers at zhangyunbi@chinadaily.com.cn
Related Stories
China-Philippines S China Sea dispute needs bilateral talks, says Argentine expert 2016-06-14 15:07
ASEAN forestry meeting kicks off in Philippines 2016-06-14 14:58
The Tribunal's Award in the 'South China Sea Arbitration' Initiated by the Philippines Is Null and Void 2016-06-11 07:47
Chinese Society of International Law releases paper on South China Sea arbitration initiated by the Philippines 2016-06-10 18:41
The tribunal's award in the 'South China Sea Arbitration' initiated by the Philippines is null and void 2016-06-10 14:30
China urges Philippines to immediately cease arbitral proceedings 2016-06-08 21:26
Today's Top News
Germany, France, Italy urge Britain not to waste time in divorcing EU
Britain urged not to waste time in divorcing EU
Turkey's Erdogan apologizes to Putin
UK opposition leader Corbyn says will not resign
10 hurt in rollercoaster accident in central Scotland
Vote poses China-UK trade ties challenge
China respects Brexit decision
UK vote blows the whole European plan wide open
Hot Topics
Lunar probe , China growth forecasts, Emission rules get tougher, China seen through 'colored lens', International board,
Editor's Picks
Hollywood snaps up rock star's dog film |
Chinese people welcome dispossessed |
The can-do generation to the fore |
Riding the wave |
Leisure giants buoy cruise market |
She followed her heart |