Lawsuit: Armstrong 'unjustly enriched'
Updated: 2013-04-25 05:43
By Associated Press in Austin, Texas (China Daily)
|
|||||||||||
In this Feb 15, 2011 file photo, Lance Armstrong pauses during an interview in Austin, Texas. The US Justice Department laid out its case in a lawsuit against Armstrong on Tuesday saying the cyclist violated his contract with the US Postal Service and was "unjustly enriched" while cheating to win the Tour de France. Thao Nguyen / Associated Press |
The Justice Department laid out its case in a lawsuit against Lance Armstrong on Tuesday, saying the cyclist violated his contract with the US Postal Service and was "unjustly enriched" while cheating to win the Tour de France.
The government had previously announced it would join the whistle-blower lawsuit brought by former Armstrong teammate Floyd Landis. Tuesday was the deadline to file its formal complaint.
The Postal Service paid about $40 million to be the title sponsor of Armstrong's teams for six of his seven Tour de France victories. The filing in US district court in Washington, DC, says the USPS paid Armstrong $17 million from 1998-2004.
The lawsuit also names former Armstrong team director Johan Bruyneel and management company Tailwind Sports as defendants.
The financial costs for Armstrong and Bruyneel could be high. The government said it would seek triple damages assessed by the jury.
"Defendants were unjustly enriched to the extent of the payments and other benefits they received from the USPS, either directly or indirectly," the complaint said.
Armstrong, who in January admitted using performance-enhancing drugs after years of denials, has argued the Postal Service's endorsement of his team earned the government agency far more than it paid him.
Armstrong attorney Elliot Peters called the government's complaint "opportunistic, and insincere".
"The US Postal Service benefited tremendously from its sponsorship of the cycling team. Its own studies repeatedly and conclusively prove this. The USPS was never the victim of fraud. Lance Armstrong rode his heart out for the USPS team, and gave the brand tremendous exposure during the sponsorship years," Peters said.
The government must prove not only that the Postal Service was defrauded, but that it was damaged somehow.
Previous studies done for the Postal Service concluded the agency reaped at least $139 million in worldwide brand exposure in four years - $35 million to $40 million for sponsoring the Armstrong team in 2001; $38 million to $42 million in 2002; $31 million in 2003; and $34.6 million in 2004.
The formal complaint against Armstrong appears to rely heavily on evidence and statements supplied by Landis and gathered by the US Anti-Doping Agency for its 2012 investigation that exposed a doping program within the USPS team. Armstrong has been banned from sports for life and stripped of his seven Tour de France victories.
Bruyneel, who lives in London, also has been charged by USADA with doping violations but is fighting that case in arbitration.
The government notes the contract with the Postal Service required riders to follow the rules of cycling, which included bans on performance-enhancing drugs and methods. Armstrong now admits using steroids, blood boosters and other illegal performance-enhancing drugs and measures to win.
By breaking the rules and covering it up, Armstrong and Bruyneel committed fraud against the US government, the complaint said.
The complaint said that for years, team officials assured the Postal Service the team was not doping.
(China Daily 04/25/2013 page23)
Today's Top News
Premier Li in plea to
quake rescuers
Xi meets former US heavyweights
Hollande's visit to open new chapter
China still top spot for Japanese companies
Nation sets sights on bigger carrier
Canada to return illegal assets
China deserves credit for rapid response to bird flu
Truck driver's organs save five lives in Wuhan
Hot Topics
Lunar probe , China growth forecasts, Emission rules get tougher, China seen through 'colored lens', International board,
Editor's Picks
Life resumes in 'isolated island' |
Supplies pour into isolated villages |
All-out efforts to save lives |
Liaoning: China's oceangoing giant |
Poultry industry under pressure |
'Spring' in the air for NGOs? |