Little imps should not be running free in society
Updated: 2016-08-30 07:54
By Xie Caifeng(China Daily)
|
|||||||||
Fourth, civil responsibility is different from criminal responsibility, because the former can be transferred or substituted while the latter cannot, and the punishment for a crime is very severe and often comes with a lifelong stigma. Hence, the change in the age for civil liability should not necessarily lead to a change in the age for criminal responsibility.
But despite the focus of juvenile justice on rehabilitation, proper punishment is also necessary. We cannot conclude that the age for criminal responsibility should be reduced to 12, but we could and should improve the existing rules.
In China, if children below 14 commit violent offenses, their parents or custodians are required to pay civil damages. In some cases, the children are sent to a juvenile correction center but more often than not they are sent back home without receiving any punishment. Some of those children even become perpetual offenders because they don't receive appropriate corrective measures after committing the first offence.
According to the theory of criminal law, a person without enough capacity to identify and control his/her actions cannot be held criminally liable. A child below the age for criminal responsibility is presumed to not have the emotional, mental and intellectual capacity to commit a crime. Sticking to a concrete age may be convenient for law enforcement but may lead to unfairness in some cases.
The law should be made flexible on this subject by, say, introducing the principle of malicious intent vis-à-vis age. It means, if a child below the age for criminal responsibility commits an offense with substantive maliciousness, he/she should be treated as a person with full capacity to realize the consequences of his/her actions. Substantive maliciousness can be reflected in a child's intent and action, and the severity of its outcome.
Of course, strengthening penalty is not the panacea for juvenile delinquency. Many studies show poverty, parental divorce and/or domestic violence generally lead juveniles toward violence; over-exposure to violence and sex on the internet, too, could have the same effect. Therefore, teachers and parents must make efforts to provide a healthy environment for children so that they understand social relations and do not commit serious offenses.
The author is a judge at the Shunyi Court in Beijing.
Related Stories
Psychological therapy for juvenile offenders 2016-06-22 10:41
Nanjing courts’ reform on juvenile and family trials 2016-04-14 16:06
Evaluate juvenile offenders before showing leniency 2016-01-22 08:12
Juvenile crime a problem as a result of children being left behind in rural areas 2015-10-23 08:22
Juvenile offenders sent home to get help 2015-09-01 07:45
Law of the People's Republic of China on Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency 2015-08-17 14:55
Today's Top News
DNA tests lead police to Gansu 'Ripper'
G20 should talk about inclusiveness of growth
Italy plans state funeral for quake victims; 268 dead
China rescue team rushes to Italy for earthquake relief
Poland: 1st European state to issue RMB debt in China
Italy rescuers toil as death toll hits nearly 250
More understanding among remaining EU states
At least 73 dead after strong quake strikes Italy
Hot Topics
Lunar probe , China growth forecasts, Emission rules get tougher, China seen through 'colored lens', International board,
Editor's Picks
Hollywood snaps up rock star's dog film |
Chinese people welcome dispossessed |
The can-do generation to the fore |
Riding the wave |
Leisure giants buoy cruise market |
She followed her heart |