Current climate treaties a lot of hot air
Updated: 2015-11-30 07:42
By Bjorn Lomborg(China Daily)
|
|||||||||
Workers install a solar panel at a photovoltaic power station in Aleteng village, northwest China. Job creation is an example of an economic co-benefit of tackling climate change. Photograph: REX/Imaginechina/REX/Imaginechina |
Paris is hosting the 21st global climate conference, and there are high hopes that negotiators will agree on a carbon-cutting treaty. But adding up the climate effects and costs of carbon-cutting commitments shows that there is something very wrong with this approach.
In a peer-reviewed research paper, I looked at the promises governments have committed to ahead of Paris (their so-called Intended Nationally Determined Contributions) for the years 2016-2030. These are what the global treaty will be based on.
By running this data through internationally recognized climate models, I found that the promises will cut global temperatures by just 0.05 degrees Celsius by 2100.China's contribution would be a 0.014 Creduction by 2100.
I also explored a far more optimistic, much less likely scenario. What if every government not only keeps every Paris promise but also shifts no emissions to other countries and keeps these reductions throughout the rest of the century? In that artificial scenario, temperatures will be reduced by just 0.17 C by 2100(with China contributing 0.048 C).
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change claims "the INDCs have the capability of limiting the forecast temperature rise to around 2.7 C by 2100". This is advocacy, not science. It essentially assumes governments will do relatively little in Paris, but right after 2030 will embark on much more ambitious climate reductions.
Let us get back to reality. What will it cost to cut global temperatures by so little?
We can add up the price tags for the Paris promises submitted by the United States, the European Union, Mexico and China, which account for about 80 percent of pledged reductions.
The US promises to cut greenhouse gas emissions 26-28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. Data from the peer-reviewed Stanford Energy Modeling Forum shows hitting the target would reduce GDP between $154 billion and $172 billion annually. The EU's promise-to cut emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030-would reduce GDP by 1.6 percent in 2030, or 287 billion ($305.68 billion) in terms of the value in 2010.Mexico's conditional promise to cut greenhouse gas and black carbon emissions by 40 percent below the current trend line would reach 4.5 percent of GDP by 2030.
Related Stories
Xi arrives in Paris for climate change summit 2015-11-30 00:56
The price of inaction: runaway climate change 2015-11-29 14:10
China shows commitment in fighting climate change: French FM 2015-11-29 10:48
China leads the way in South-South climate change cooperation 2015-11-27 22:38
Xi's visits mark new era of global climate change campaign, China-Africa cooperation 2015-11-26 18:42
Climate change, artificial intelligence and being disabled 气候变化,人工智能和残疾舞蹈演员 2015-11-26 14:58
Today's Top News
Inspectors to cover all of military
Britons embrace 'Super Thursday' elections
Campaign spreads Chinese cooking in the UK
Trump to aim all guns at Hillary Clinton
Labour set to take London after bitter campaign
Labour candidate favourite for London mayor
Fossil footprints bring dinosaurs to life
Buffett optimistic on China's economic transition
Hot Topics
Lunar probe , China growth forecasts, Emission rules get tougher, China seen through 'colored lens', International board,
Editor's Picks
Sinopec opens new industrial platform |
Data point to Chinese economy shrugging off sluggishness and stabilizing |
China leads way on US adoptions |
Season of the locust eaters |
Humble bicyclist becomes Beijing nighthawk |
Chinese must adapt to UK 'study shock' |