Shambaugh fails to defend his position
Updated: 2015-04-10 08:08
By Chen Weihua(China Daily)
|
|||||||||||
Chinese President Xi Jinping shakes hands with US President Barack Obama during the APEC Welcome Banquet at the Beijing National Aquatics Center, or the Water Cube, in Beijing on Nov 10, 2014. Kim Kyung-Hoon / Reuters |
I didn't realize I would be missed so much so soon after leaving Washington for my home in Shanghai for holidays. Just hours after landing in Shanghai on April 2, a fellow journalist sent me a message via instant messaging service WeChat, saying David Shambaugh mentioned my name multiple times that day during his talk at George Washington University.
The talk, which I listened to days later on the Internet, was largely a crisis management for his March 7 article in The Wall Street Journal titled "The Coming Chinese Crackup", in which he declared the "endgame of the Communist rule" in China had begun.
Compared with his much criticized one-sided views in the WSJ, Shambaugh was a bit more balanced on April 2 despite his continued pessimism in China's future and his prediction that the Communist rule would end 20 years from now.
Yet the 10 challenges facing China according to Shambaugh in his talk - China at the Crossroads - are nothing new. From economic reforms, corruption to income inequality, they have been mentioned in the annual Government Work Report for years. Just a month ago, Premier Li Keqiang presented a far more comprehensive outline of the challenges in his report. Even a Beijing cab driver could elaborate some of the challenges facing the country.
The good thing, as Shambaugh admitted this time, is that top leaders are aware of these problems and taking steps to address them. But who would be na?ve enough to assume that a large developing country, with a population four times that of the United States and per capita GDP ranking around 90th in the world, will be free of big challenges anytime soon?
Shambaugh defended his WSJ article by blaming the newspaper for giving it a sensational headline. He said his article should be judged by its content, not title. But most people who have read his article would not endorse his conclusion based merely on random and superficial evidence. And among those people are some of the sharpest critics of China in US think tanks.
Related Stories
Shambaugh China essay in shambles 2015-03-13 10:37
Bias brings shame to Shambaugh 2015-03-13 09:29
Shambaugh China essay rebuffed 2015-03-11 11:07
Today's Top News
Putin backs China's Silk Road proposal
Boston bomber convicted, may face death penalty
Zhou trial likely to serve as model
Belarus to expand trade and economic ties with China
Cause of China chemical plant blast identified
Fleeing war-torn Yemen, Chinese, foreign nationals share the same boat
Liu Xiang expected to announce retirement on Tuesday
Toilet revolution for tourism evolution: Opinion
Hot Topics
Lunar probe , China growth forecasts, Emission rules get tougher, China seen through 'colored lens', International board,
Editor's Picks
What do we know about AIIB |
Full coverage of Boao Forum for Asia |
Annual legislative and political advisory sessions |
Festival Special: Apps that make holiday shopping easier |
Listed firms caught in anti-corruption net |
Conca set to return to China |