Canada OKs CNOOC's $15b purchase of Nexen
Updated: 2012-12-08 09:41
By Joseph Boris in New York (China Daily)
|
|||||||||||
In line with Harper's sentiment, the ministry also said Friday that future decisions would be subject to strict new rules on investment in Canada by government-owned foreign companies. (A delay in drafting the revisions had been cited as the reason for holding up a decision on the Nexen acquisition.)
CNOOC has said it will absorb about $4.3 billion in Nexen's debt as part of the deal.
The Chinese company has for years signaled its desire to buy energy assets abroad. It attempted to acquire US-based Unocal Corp in 2005 for $18.5 billion but later abandoned that bid under pressure from political leaders in Washington citing national-security concerns.
In 2011, Nexen and Beijing-based CNOOC jointly invested $2 billion to develop oil sands on Alberta's Long Lake, a partnership that set the stage for the takeover. CNOOC's first investment in Canada was a 17 percent stake in oil sands developer MEG Energy Inc in 2005.
The Nexen deal raises CNOOC's proven reserves by 30 percent, the company has said. It currently has about nine years' worth of proven reserves based on current production.
Special Coverage:
Chinese Companies' Overseas Footprint
Related Stories
CNOOC, Nexen reapply for US deal approval 2012-11-28 14:59
Cnooc to agree on Canada's demands for Nexen bid 2012-11-21 09:45
ChemChina may end CNOOC deal 2012-11-07 14:48
CNOOC's Nexen bid 'will be approved' 2012-11-06 16:37
Canada extends review of CNOOC bid 2012-11-05 10:30
CNOOC lifts annual output target 2012-10-25 09:55
Today's Top News
President Xi confident in recovery from quake
H7N9 update: 104 cases, 21 deaths
Telecom workers restore links
Coal mine blast kills 18 in Jilin
Intl scholarship puts China on the map
More bird flu patients discharged
Gold loses sheen, but still a safe bet
US 'turns blind eye to human rights'
Hot Topics
Lunar probe , China growth forecasts, Emission rules get tougher, China seen through 'colored lens', International board,
Editor's Picks
|
|
|
|
|
|











